| * |
Data collection scope
expanded in 2004 to cover all buildings and campuses over 3000 sqm. The
figures of 2004 are thus not directly comparable with previous years.
|
| ** |
Even if the total
amount of solid waste has increased, Nokia has managed to keep a good level
in terms of waste utilization %. In general the reported total waste has
increased due to the increase in production volume and headcount.
|
| ** |
Other waste includes
fractions that are considered separate from solid waste streams because
of their special nature. In 2006 waste categorization was changed a bit
and hence part of waste previously reported under Other Waste, is now reported
under Solid Waste. That explains the change in figures between 2005 and
2006. |