UniverSelf Deliverable 3.2

and conclusions section are needed. In my opinion, the introduction should very briefly recap the main points addressed by each use case so that the reviewers do not have to resort to other documents to remind themselves of these. Ideally this recap should emphasize the problems of the use cases addressed by the methods of this deliverable in order to pave the way for them in the following sections. Comment [sg5]: The deliverable is already 70 pages, let alone introduction and conclusions added. Some contributions would need to be reduced in size or have parts moved to an appendix section. Comment [sg6]: Abbreviations sections could be added. Comment [sg7]: Numbering of equations, figures and tables should also be continuous and not on a per contribution basis. Comment [sg8]: There are some formatting differences compared to the template ; e.g. 3rd level headings, figure and table captions. Deleted: Comment [sg1]: Would rather omit ; the part on cooperative network/service operations may raise questions on how this differs from task T3.4 and deliverable D3.4. Comment [sg2]: The role of D3.1 and the fortcoming D3.4 is also similar ; therefore the differentiation with them should be made clear.